Showing posts with label Seattle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Seattle. Show all posts

Monday, October 27, 2025

Storybook Ending: A Novel

Storybook Ending: A Novel by Moira Macdonald

A woman leaves a note in a book in order to reach out to a bookstore employee who works with used books. However, he gets distracted when processing the books and does not notice the note. Another woman ends up receiving the book. The two women respond to the note, each thinking they are responding to the cute man in the bookstore. The man doesn't realize what is going on. He is also further distracted with a movie that is being partially filmed in the bookstore. He has been asked to play a small role in the movie. His role gradually gets expanded. He also has found an interesting book from an unknown author and is interested in finding out more. All the characters have encounters with each other in the "real world" without knowing that they are also communicating with each other in other means. The book comes to a conclusion with a number of fun twists. The book has a light tone with relatable characters with various struggles that are trying to decide what to do with their life in Seattle.

Monday, October 13, 2025

Wild in Seattle: Stories at the Crossroads of People and Nature

Wild in Seattle: Stories at the Crossroads of People and Nature by David Williams

This book explores the various "wildlife" in Seattle. Most of it is real wildlife, from birds to beasts to vegetation. However, there is also "fake" wildlife, such as the various "birds" downtown seattle, mostly in the form of sculptures. It was a fun, interesting book to go through, but little of it stuck.


Wednesday, July 09, 2025

Bicycling in Seattle, 1879-1904

Bicycling in Seattle, 1879-1904 by Frank Cameron

This is a short history of the first bicycle boom in Seattle. Seattle missed some of the earlier booms, such as the penny farthings. However, it took big to the late 1800s safety bike boom. There were once dozens of bike shops on second avenue. Multiple velodroms appeared all around the regions. The bicycle advocates also wanted roads to ride on. Hills posed challenges, but there were still various bike routes created. They worked hard to improve existing roads and to build roads to travel on. There was a bicycle toll road started to the south. It was never completed, but did have a viaduct through the mud flats built. Other key routes were improved with cinder trails. (However, they had to make sure animals were kept off.) Alas, the bicycle boom tapered off. Many of these bicycle routes become roads, while building lots encroached on others. Interlaken is one of the few remnants. Just imagine if we still had the network radiating from downtown connecting to other places.

Saturday, June 28, 2025

The Lines That Make Us: Stories from Nathan's Bus

The Lines That Make Us: Stories from Nathan's Bus by Nathan Vass, forward by Paul Constant

Nathan is a photographer and Seattle Bus Driver. He enjoys driving some of the more "interesting" routes in the city - including nighttime routes through diverse, low-income areas. He relates many of his experiences that he has had driving the bus. There are stories of "regulars" that are often provoking others, but occasionally well-behaved. There are those that are down on their luck, yet happy and optimistic. One day he picked up a panhandler that was covered in dog poop. Previous buses refused to pick him up. However, after he shared his story of being pelted by a BMW the other riders on the bus helped stand up for him. Nathan also detailed a conversation he overheard between two shabby-looking passengers discussing the best writings by Shakespeare. Due to the routes, many of the stories involve those down on their luck. He observes that those tend to be the most "extreme". They may be the most polite people as well as the most rude. They remain people.

Monday, June 02, 2025

Good Night Seattle

Good Night Seattle by Jay Steere, illustrated by Joe Veno

Some kids view the sights of Seattle during the day and night before finally going to bed to say "good night" to the city. The book does a good job of getting some key tourist sites correct. Only the library scene has rain - and there the kids are having fun playing in the rain.

Thursday, April 10, 2025

Wheedle on the Needle

Wheedle on the Needle by Stephen Cosgrove (Author), Robin James (Illustrator)

The Wheedle lived peaceable in the northwest. Then some people came and started whistling while they worked. He could not sleep with this noise. He tried scaring them and taking their tools. These didn't work. He then moved out to the high mountain where he could sleep well. After some years, the workers came to the foot of the mountain and whistled. He decided to fix this by gathering up clouds and then climbing to the top of the space needle. He made it rain endlessly up there. This got people to stop whistling and enabled him to sleep. However, the people were upset about this. The maor proposed a solution - they would make big earmuffs for the Wheedle. They did this and now he could sleep and stop the rain. His nose now glows at the top the Space Needle. The story is a tongue-in-cheek Seattle story.

Monday, December 09, 2024

Street Trees of Seattle

Street Trees of Seattle: An Illustrated Walking Guide by Taha Ebrahimi

During the Covid-19 pandemic, people took to more individual outdoor pursuits in their neighborhoods. The author of this book decided to explore street trees. The book explores trees in a few different neighborhoods. Each neighborhood has a "focus" tree with some other trees to explore. One minor fault is that the map of Seattle omits the northern part of the city. (Even though there are no trees shown there, the map could at least show the neighborhoods!) There is some interesting history, as well as a reference to the millenia's old "tree" in Utah.

Saturday, April 20, 2024

Seattle, Past to Present

Seattle, Past to Present by Roger Sale

This history of Seattle written nearly 50 years ago seems remarkably current. Many of the concerns and politics seem familiar today. We've gone from Boeing to Microsoft to Amazon. Seattle has continued to grow in part because it was there. It grew during the Yukon gold rush because it was already of sufficient size to support those coming through. It has grown during the tech boom because it already had a tech economy present.

Seattle is less than 200 years old, with the politics different than many east coast cities. Seattle has never had a "boss". Initially everybody lived close together. Rich and poor would intermingle. Then things started to change. Places like the Highlands were built to keep the rich away from the poor. Things moved towards a "separate" culture.  Cars, freeways and suburbs came to exacerbate this situation. Progressive good government advocates came to be replaced by more left-wing socialist tendencies.

Seattle was initially in competition with Tacoma. Seattle did manage to get the University, while Tacoma got the railroad first. However, Seattle was persistent, and got its own railroad. It was also able to keep growing, while Tacoma stagnated.

Seattle has a history of remaking itself. Tide flats were filled in. Hills were leveled. Canals were dug. Some of these changes may not have been so useful. There have also been plans that have never been carried out. There was the Bogue plan which would have created a system of parks and subways and made a great city ahead of its time. Alas, it was defeated at the polls, thanks in part to "anti-elite" writing. (Ironically, the "elite" had not mobilized enough behind it because they did not have enough to gain individually.)  There were also plans for leveling many hills and bulldozing areas to make more freeways. We are probably much better off that these never came to be.

When this was written in 1976, the future of Seattle did not look strong. There were concerns about Seattle not growing and innovating as it should, though there was still potential. It appears that some of the potential has been exercised, though plenty of concerns remain.

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

The Seattle Street-Smart Naturalist: Field Notes from the City

The Seattle Street-Smart Naturalist: Field Notes from the City (Seattle) by David B. Williams

I had initially thought this book would point out interesting "natural areas" in the city. It does a bit of that. However, the focus is on "themes" of nature within the cities. There are chapters on hills and fault lines that are very place-centric. However, others cover topics such as eagles, crows, geese, bugs, and invasive species. There are many interesting nuggets in the book. Crows are very territorial, and are thriving in the city in thanks to the open space in the suburbs. 

Many of the plants and animals in the city are non-native invasive species. They are able to thrive and push out many of the natives. Animals have had a love/hate relationship. At one time, significant effort was made to increase the geese population. Now, there is more often active culling. 

The area occupied by Seattle had a diverse landscape before the city was developed. There were areas dominated by large evergreen trees. There were also creeks, bogs and wetlands with diverse flora and fauna. Some areas such as Carkeek Park and Thornton Creek expose some of this diversity. Other areas have long been paved over.

Saturday, March 30, 2024

Too High and Too Steep: Reshaping Seattle’s Topography

Too High and Too Steep: Reshaping Seattle’s Topography by David B. Williams

Seattle's Mohai museum has 3d model of Seattle where you can hit to "bring down" the changes in the city's topography. Land has been reclaimed from many areas, especially along the Duwamish. Water has also been extended via the ship canal to connect Lake Washington to the ocean. These are some impressive engineering accomplishments. This book details the various changes along with the process and people behind them.

The book begins with a history of how Seattle was shaped in the first place. Volcanos, earthquakes and glaciers all have played important roles in shaping the Seattle we know. The Duwamish and other tribes have occupied the area for some time and have caused some minor changes in the landscape (mostly from coastal "garbage dumps") The big changes came with the white settlers and especially transportation. They wanted a railroad. They needed a way for it to get places. Thus they built trestles over tideflats.  Why not fill in the tideflats to get more land and make it easier? And it was done. Hills seemed to impede the city. Why not use mining experience to sluice one away. Done! A canal? Sure. There were plans for more flattening, but they eventually fell by the wayside.

The great topographical engineering era ended with the great depression. The economic benefit of flattening ended up not being as great as expected, and the distance from water may have made it more difficult to sluice other hills. The dominance of the car also changed the calculus. Cars were not as impeded by topography, and thus instead of flattening hills, the new change was to demolish neighborhoods to make way for highways. A tunnel might by used to get around some steep spots. 

The author has gone out to identify many of the areas where great projects have taken place. He has traveled to many of the modern places that have been significantly impacted by this geo-engineering efforts. This would make for a nice "tour" of Seattle.

Thursday, October 26, 2023

Biking Uphill in the Rain: The Story of Seattle from behind the Handlebars

The early history of bicycling in Seattle can be quite depressing. There were a variety of early bike paths in the city. These took people out to the lakes and other areas. There were even plans for paths connecting Seattle and Tacoma. Then cars came and everything went to pot. The small bike paths were replaced by large boulevards. This was not necessarily bad. But then the boulevards became owned by cars. The freeway even took over some. Wouldn't it be nice if these small paths still existed?

Laws came to give preference to cars. Pedestrian was adopted as a derogatory term for people. Jaywalking was a spoof of jaydriving as a way to refer to incompetent walkers. (Even though the walkers were doing what they always did.) Rather than the joy of bicycling, people were stuck with the grind of driving and the ugliness of killing innocent people, all so they could move a little bit faster to travel longer distances.

Freeways came to produce a huge scar on Seattle. The initial freeway went right to downtown, cutting off nearby neighborhoods. There were plenty of angry people with means that mobilized against the freeway, but it was too late. However, the mobilization did eventually lead to the cancellation of other freeway projects. Seattle was lucky in that it was not so destroyed be freeways. Yet it was still heavily damaged.

Bicycling finally started to come back again in the post-freeway era. "Bicycle Sundays" on a closed Lake Washington Boulevard really kicked kicked things off. The freeway express lanes were also opened to cyclists on weekends. (Why don't we have that anymore?) The Burke-Gillman trail came to be. Some greenways and bike lanes appeared. Then there were law improvements. Planners actually respected the use of streets by people rather than two ton metal boxes.

However, even the positive had the depressing aspects. There were horrible misuses of infrastructure. (The Train tracks on westlake were initially turned into a giant parking lot. It took a lot of time and battling phony environmental complaints to finally get a bike path in place.) There were still too many people getting killed or injured by cars. "Complete street" work is often shortchanged. (Where are the bike lanes on Holman?) There has been progress, but there is still a long way to go. 

Saturday, February 11, 2023

Golden Arm

A boy lives in a trailer park off Aurora Avenue in Seattle with his mom and half-brother. He is a good pitcher on his high school baseball team. However, his team was suspended for half of one season because most of the team got in trouble. To make matters worse, the trailer park he lives in and the driving range he works at are going to be torn down to build townhomes. A guy from the rich part of town offers him a chance to live with them and attend that school. His pitching ability can be the one thing that pushes them over the hump to win the state championship. It almost works out. However, his brother's involvement with drugs nearly derails everything.

The book has a fairly accurate portrayal of the landscape of North Seattle. It does take some liberty with the high schools in the area. (There is no "Broadview", "North Central" or "Laurelhurst" high) However, most of the rest of the high schools in the city are real. There are trailer parks near Aurora with a driving range and Home Depot nearby. The community center, donut shop and even the prostitutes on Aurora are also accurate depictions of the area. 

The personal and baseball side is not quite as believable. He seems to lack any significant struggles in his pitching. His "better than perfect" game just seems to happen. It seems the faults are not with his pitching, but with fielding. His brother seems to be able to get deeper into the drug business without any issues. Despite this, he quickly transforms from a flunk-out to a straight-A student. Then everything derails a couple minutes before the state championship game. Would a player really jump the fence minutes before starting the game, thinking he is the only one that could save his brother from a drug deal gone bad? It feels like it was a reach to temper the out-of-control expectations that were set up. (It would have been more believable if her were jumped when trying to visit his brother earlier.) The author was still able to have him squeeze into the draft (in part via a good word from a drafter teammate.) It just wasn't as believable or satisfying as it could have been.

Saturday, November 19, 2022

Crossing the ship canal on bicycle


 

Crossing the Ship Canal is a necessity in order to get from North Seattle to downtown.

From the west to east, here are the options:

1. BNSF railroad bridge 

- You can take a sounder train. The catch is that there are no stop between King Street Station (at the south end of Downtown) and Edmonds. There is space to bring your bike onboard.

  • Bike, Pedestrian: on transit
  • Transit: Sounder train is fast and scenic, but doesn't run often or to many places

2. The locks.

 The "orphan" section of the Burke Gilman trail goes right to the northern entrance. There are also many quiet Ballard streets. Then you need to walk your bike through. Due to locks being locks, there is almost always a path open. (Though you may find yourself walking back another way just as it changes.)   

On the north end, you can cross Commodore way to a wooden bike bridge over the railroad tracks into Magnolia. (This can be a little steep and slippery when wet.) Commodore way is a pretty lightly traveled street with ample blackberry picking opportunities in the summer. From there, 27th to Fort Street bridge over the tracks takes you to the Gillman cycle track. Keep going on 20th, then take the turn off onto the dead-end section of 20th to get to the Eliot Bay trail. This will continue down to the sculpture gardens and the water front. 

This is the best option looking for a quiet, low-traffic way to get across the ship canal, especially if coming from downtown.

One key limitation is that it is subject to closure. (It is typically open 7am-9pm, but may shut down for days for maintenance)

  • Bike: Slow and easy, but requires walking
  • Pedestrian: slow and easy
  • Transit: N/A

3. Ballard Bridge

This is a long bridge at 15th Ave NW. It is the worst way to get across the ship canal, but it is in a convenient location for central Ballard access. Typically, cyclists will ride on the sidewalk on the "right" side. However, it is not uncommon to see a cyclists traveling the opposite way (especially if they are coming from a destination on that side.) The bridge has a long viaduct from the north that connects to a draw bridge. At times during the summer the bridge has been stuck in the up position. 

The sidewalk is not wide. It can fit one cyclist comfortably. When passing another cyclist or pedestrian, one will often move over to the side to help let the other person pass. (Don't by the person in headphones slowing people from behind.)

You can also ride your bike across the bridge itself, rather than use the sidewalk. The grating does not make for the nicest ride, but it is doable. It is a commitment, I've biked across comfortable at midday. It is a big commitment that I would not advise any time there is traffic. 

The most common way to access the bridge from the north is coming down Ballard Avenue from the west. When the street end, turn right and head up the sidewalk on the right side of the bridge. (It is pretty much in the middle of the street.) From the east, it is common to make a left turn from Leary. Go on the far right by the bus stop and just continue south to get to the bridge sidewalk.

I have also accessed the bridge from 15th Ave NW. Typically, I'll stay to the far right around 50th and go down to Leary and get on the sidewalk there. 

If I am feeling really bold, I'll ride down 15th Ave NW, then move over to go on the bridge over Leary. There is no sidewalk on this bridge and no easy way to get to the sidewalk over the main Ballard bridge. You are committed to biking the street the whole way over the Ballard bridge. The advantage of this is that you have a potential long stretch of no lights. The disadvantage is that you have to ride with traffic and deal with a few relatively high speed right side merges. It is not for the faint at heart, but it can be very fast.

If you do the sidewalk route, you can continue until you get to Emerson. There, there is is a cutout to the left that lets you get on 15th. The trickiest part about this is right turning cars (some of which actual use their signals.) Best bet is to wait until there is enough of a gap for you to get past the intersection before a car would turn right. (There is enough space for you to go next to a car going straight.) The cars merging onto 15th from Emerson seem to be much less of an issue.

Riding on 15th/Elliott is fairly nice if you like riding on busy roads. There is a wide bus lane that allows bikes. I've found myself more likely to be stuck behind a bus than to be blocking the progress of a bus. (Though I do like to move off to an empty sidewalk to let a bus pass me.) I typically take the Dravus underpass, though taking the Dravus exit and getting back on is a more comfortable option. 15th is a pretty nice route through uptown and downtown. Another option is to exit at Dravus and go over the railroad tracks and turn left to go down the Elliot Bay trail. Galer provides additional access, but the bridge is a little bit more painful.

If you are not into the whole riding with heavy traffic thing, you can go over the Ballard bridge and continue as it goes down Emerson. When you get to the bottom of the Emerson ramp, you can turn right to backtrack and go under the bridge and swing back around to the sidewalk on the left side, this trail will meet up with the Gilman Ave W Cycletrack that can take you to the Elliott Bay trail.  (I'll admit I am more likely to just keep going straight down Emerson and riding with traffic before turning left on Gillman. This is partially out of habit, because this is what you had to do before the cycletrack was there. It also feels bad to turn around.)

Going back north, things are not quite so easy. You can take the Emerson path under the Ballard bridge, then go up to Nickerson and follow it around to get on the bridge sidewalk going North. (There is a little bike shortcut, so you don't have to stick with traffic the whole way, but there is not much of bike space on that section of Nickerson.) You could also just go up the Emerson ramp and ride on the "left side" sidewalk heading north.

I would more commonly just ride on 15th. I was more likely to take the Dravus exit if I were headed north than south. (It is an easier merge.) But the fastest way is to stick with 15th. If there is heavy traffic, you could probably bike over the bridge at car speed - but you could bike over the sidewalk at faster than car speed. (I've seen buses exit at Leary, stop for the red light and bus stop and still end up in front of cars that were behind them.)

  • Bike: fast and advanced with some easier options; not pleasant
  • Pedestrian: A long unpleasant walk
  • Transit: Frequent all day D line service with other express bus service

4. Fremont Bridge



The Fremont bridge is probably the most used ship canal crossing. It is also the lowest bridge and most likely to be raised. The ship canal trail/Westlake bike path connect to the south side, while the Burke Gilman connects to the north. Most cyclists use the sidewalks to ride across. However, it is common to see cyclists on the bridge grating itself (especially after the bridge has recently been lowered.) It can get crowded with many pedestrians and cyclists. 

A common way to access the bridge from the north is via Fremont Ave N. Just continue down Fremont and ride across the bridge. From the Burke Gillman, you will typically veer off to the 34th street bike path to connect to the bridge at Fremont. (You could also walk up the stairs to the bridge directly from the Burke Gilman, but that is best done while not carrying a bike.)

After crossing, you can continue straight to go on the Dexter bike lane that will continue to downtown. You can also cross left on the near-side crosswalk to go down the Westlake bike path. Turning right at Florentia and right on 3rd is another way down to the Westlake bike path (via ship canal trail). Taking a right turn on the path will take you under the Fremont bridge on a bumpy road that connects the two trails.

From the south, the Westlake Bike Path leads you directly to the right side sidewalk. You can also continue down Dexter and cross Westlake to directly access the trail. After crossing, you can join a large group of cyclists slogging up the Fremont hill, or you can head off in either direction down the Burke Gilman.

  • Pedestrians: Join everyone else for a saunter across the bridge
  • Bicyclists: It is crowded, but a nice connection
  • Transit: A few local buses go over the bridge 

5. Aurora Bridge

This is the bridge sidewalk that I am least likely to see used. But, it is also one of the better commute bridges. The sidewalks are a little wider than Ballard and the bridge feels shorter. It is also the only "fixed" bridge that you can bike across. I have smirked when I look down from the Aurora bridge to see the Fremont bridge up.

You can ride on the bridge itself, but I would not recommend it. The lanes are narrow and metro buses routinely take up 2 lanes. I would love to see the bridge restriped to have two lanes in each direction and a bike lane. I have biked across the bridge deck when traffic was really low. (Uh, 2AM). It is much easier to manage headed north, due to the downhill slope. 

From north, you can access from Aurora Ave N. (Another secret route - there is a pretty wide bus/bike lane for most of the street. Most of the bus stops have arrival signs helping you to know when a bus will be coming. Even when parking is allowed, the lane is wide enough to allow plenty of bike space. Heading north, the new Green Lake cycle path took out what was a comfortable shoulder, but you can slip on to the path if need be.)

If you are cycling south down Aurora, you can access the bridge to the right, as Fremont Way merges on to Aurora. There is something resembling a crosswalk there, but your mileage may vary. You will need to lift your bike over the curb to get to the bridge before the railing blocks the way.

I like to use Aurora as the "lazy" alternative to the Fremont bridge. Instead of continuing down Fremont, I'll take a left at Fremont Way (near 39th). Then jump on the sidewalk near the bus stop to continue on the Aurora bridge sidewalk. There is now a curb cut at Raye street making it easy to get off. Watch for cars turning right and cross the street, continue on the Aurora should for a short bit and take the first exit (Dexter Way) which leads you to the top of Dexter hill. This lets you avoid the down and up of Fremont/Dexter along with the potential of the bridge going up.

If you are really into speed, just continue down Aurora. Just keep going to the right as if going to the tunnel. A bicycles must exit sign will let you exit right after you have crossed Mercer. This will bring you to 6th close to MoPop.  (This can be a fine to see on maps with all the spaghetti of multi-layered roads in the area.) You have now managed to get from the ship canal past Mercer without a single traffic light. You can feel like a car. 

Alas, WSDOT has made a mess of the northbound route. Aurora used to be a great way to avoid Mercer going north. However, they have made the tunnel merge on the right and even signed it as no bikes. (Though people have conveniently etched out the sign.) The right lane has more cars merging in, is uphill and allows general traffic. It is just not as great.

From the south, a common way to access the Aurora bridge is from 6th Ave (often from Dexter). Get on the bridge around Canlis. There are also ways to access from the Queen Anne side, as well as jumping on other places. (There is also a decent sidewalk for most of the stretch.) 

After crossing the Aurora bridge heading north, continuing on Aurora can be a pain. The road itself is nice. However, you need to jump off a pretty high curb and cross the Bridge Way exit ramp to get there. (There is a crosswalk. Good luck.) Once you do that, you have an uphill slog followed by a fast downhill. 

As another option, you can continue down the sidewalk and pick another way up. I like going up the wide Woodland Park Ave. You can also go under the Aurora Bridge and up to Fremont. (You have manage to avoid a good chunk of the climb.)

  • Transit: Daily service (complete with entertainment) on the E line. Many other buses.
  • Bike: Avoid hills! Fast and more advanced, mut missing some connections
  • Pedestrian: Long, noisy walk with great views

6. I-5 Bridge

Uggh. This one goes nice and straight and "flattens" some of the hills. Yet bikes are prohibited. The least they can do is turn the express lanes into a bike path.

  • Bike: on transit
  • Pedestrian: on transit
  • Transit: Some Sound Transit express busses, but those are dying away

7. University Bridge

The U-bridge is the one bridge with separate bike lanes and sidewalks. Access can be a little annoying. From the south, it is typically accessed via Eastlake. You just need to slog through a lot of lights. Maybe protected bike lanes will be coming soon? Cross the bridge and you can exit to go to University of Washington campus. Or you can continue up 11th. There is a "paint only" bike lane next to parking. It is also uphill with a lot of lights. There are also other options, including a greenway on 12th. There is also access to the Burke Gilman, but I seem to get lost every time I try.

I like to access via Fuhrman so that I can avoid the mess on Eastlake. However, I often do it wrong and end up going down some crazy steep hills. (There is one I keep manage to hit that is just an ugly combination of steepness and bad pavement that I end up walking my bike.) When I do it right, I end up on Boyer and then just cruise on over.

From the north, Roosevelt heads straight down. It has a nice protected bike lane. However, there are a lot of driveways and whatnot, making it a challenge. On the other side, you get Eastlake. You can also try to follow the signs to loop along next to Lake Union. (They can be a little sketchy. I've found myself trying to figure out which way to go out of an alley) 

  • Pedestrian: Sidewalk without bikes!
  • Bike: Bikelane without pedestrians
  • Transit: some local busses

8. Mountlake Bridge

This feels like the shortest bridge and has a lot of pedestrian traffic.  There is a little bit of neighborhood between the bridge and 520. The streets are really beat up. You can go through the neighborhood to get to the 520 trail. Depending on the state of construction you may be able to go on a trail under the freeway or have to deal with a nasty intersection to get the Arboretum. 

On the north side, you can quickly connect to the light rail station and over to the Burke Gilman trail. Southwest of the bridge, you can connect through a park that has a path under the freeway.

The University Bridge will do a better job of getting you downtown. However, there are plenty of greenways and places to explore. You are likely to find a steep hill on a connection from the bridge to downtown.

  • Pedestrian: Go for a walk from campus
  • Bike: Access to the eastside
  • Transit: Many buses connecting to light rail

9. Link Light-rail tunnel

The light rail has space for bikes. From Westlake to Roosevelt, the stations are all greatly situated with plenty of two-way walkable traffic. Then the light rail starts running next to the freeway at Northgate. It quickly pivots from "reasonable means of transit" to "lets get buses off the freeway"
  • Bike, Pedestrian: N/A
  • Transit: You won't see much underground, but it is fast.

10. All the way around

Rather than take a bridge, you could go all the way around lake washington. You still may end up going over a few bridges, but you avoid the ship canal bridge. You could head up the Burke Gilman near the UW campus. It turns into the Sammamish River Trail. You could exit at Juanita and hug Lake Washington. Or you could continue to Waynita (who named these?) It is a little more confusing of an exit (through a park), but less hilly. Continue down through downtown Kirkland, and then meet up with the 520 bridge. Cross it and you are south of the ship canal.

You can also continue on the trail until you reach downtown Redmond and then meet up with the 520 trail. It is supposedly "All trail". However, the 520 trail will often exit and have you slog through slow intersections. (And there is a part where it is on street for a while without very well signed street connections.

If you really want to go far, you could go all the way around Lake Washington. There is some signage and some trails. The part through Bellevue can be a bit confusing. The section of Renton at the bottom of Lake Washington takes you near a Boeing facility with just about every airline represented. But be careful not to hit some dead ends there.

11. Ferry

Now we are getting into the theoretical. You can take the Edmonds-Kingston ferry from Edmonds to Kingston. Then take the fast ferry from Kingston to Seattle. Total time is around two hours. (It could be a little faster with the right connection). Getting to Kingston costs around $10, while the ferry from Kingston is around $2. (Fares on both ferries are primarily charged when going to Kingston.) The Edmonds-Kingston ferry runs all day, while the fast ferry is primarily during rush hour. You could also bike from Kingston to Bainbridge and catch the all-day Bainbridge ferry. (Google maps shows it as about an hour and a half. Not sure how nice of a route that is.)

  • Transit: ferry - a little more options than the train
  • Bike: on transit
  • pedestrian: on transit

12. Personal watercraft

As you go down 3rd Ave NW, you can see 3rd Ave W continue on. Old maps show plenty of streets going through what is now the ship canal. You can look up old street names to determine what the streets are in this map. Nye street is the current Phinney. Section street is now 3rd Ave NW. Both chugged along across what is now the ship canal. The ship canal is not that wide. While it doesn't look like thee is easy access right at 3rd NW, it does look like you can get to the water just a little bit west down the Burke Gilman. Why not use a watercraft to continue across? To be fully self-contained, you could strap an inflatable paddleboard to the back of your bike, then somehow balance the bike on the paddleboard as you go across. Or just go for an Amphibious cycle

  • Transit: none
  • Bike: amphibious? Or perhaps carry a paddleboard
  • Carry some sort of watercraft





Wednesday, June 01, 2022

This Boy's Life

Driving out to North Cascades National Park, you pass through Concrete. It looked like a city with history. Wikipedia mentioned that This Boy's Life was set there, so it looked like a good book to read. In the book, the author and his mother travel from the east coast to Utah in search of mining riches. That doesn't pan out, so they settle in Salt Lake. After a breakup, they move to Seattle. After further issues, it is off to the mountains. He lives 30 minutes from Concrete and attends school there. He spends time in boy scouts and becomes Catholic. He also has to endure abusive step parents and engages in a life of mischief at all stops.  He eggs cars with a buddy, kills animals with his gun and commits all sorts of petty theft. He is not the top of guy you would want to meet up with. Somehow out of all this he becomes a writer.

Saturday, April 30, 2022

Finding old houses in Seattle


 Where are the old houses in Seattle?

First, what were the populations


How many people were living in Seattle?

4568
YearSeattleBallardKing County
1860188302
187011512120
188035336910
189042837163663989
1900806714568110053
1910237194284638
1920315312389273

The tricky part is understanding what the population represents. The Annexation map shows a steady increase in size of the city. The one below shows early annexations (up to 1938). A huge chunk of north Seattle (up to 130th) was annexed later. 

For the purpose of old houses, there were 80,671 people living in Seattle in 1900. However, the city limits then were much smaller than they are now. The US Census has populations of individual precincts in King County in 1890 and 1900. What are those precincts? A census site links some together. I'll just guess and say there were about 50,000 people living in the modern Seattle city limits in 1890.

To make things interesting, there was the Seattle Fire in 1889. This destroyed much of the central business district. It also led to a rapid increase in population as the city was rebuilt. I'll guess that a great deal of the pre-1889 buildings were destroyed. There was probably a lot of "get things done quickly" mentality for housing immediately after the fire. I doubt there would be much of that housing that would last. However, I would expect to find a few bits of 1890s housing still around. The areas that were later annexed would probably have some housing.

By 1900, Seattle had 80,671 residents. Ballard had 4.568 at the time. Add in other areas, and a population of 90,000 for the area of modern Seattle seems quite conservative.

Now what about finding the old buildings? The King County Assesor has data that includes the address and year of construction of property in Seattle. I grabbed the residential file. (This does miss out on a few older houses that have been converted to commercial.) It includes the entire county. To narrow down to Seattle, a little bit of grep magic by zip code:

cat EXTR_ResBldg.csv|grep -e '98177\|98133\|9810\|98112\|98115\|98116\|98117\|98118\|98119\|98121\|98122\|98125\|98126\|98133\|98134\|98136\|98144\|98154\|98164\|98174\|98195\|98199' >seattle100YearHouses.csv 

That may grab a few bits on the periphery where the zip code spans the city limits, but should be close enough for our purposes. I sorted by year built and then removed everything more than 100 years old.

Interestingly, there was nothing before 1900.

The breakdown by year:


Something seems a little suspicious there. There were more 1900 constructions than 1901 and 1902 combined. Were some houses backdated? Or is there some weird Y2K thing going on?

I loaded those into a Google map and:

Suspiciously, there were none in the downtown area. Perhaps I had a bad filter on the zip codes?

I tried pulling all of King County:


YearhousesChange vs. previous
1894 1
1900 2112
1901 708 -66%
1902 710 0%
1903 872 23%
1904 1261 45%
1905 1478 17%
1906 2232 51%
1907 1740 -22%
1908 2496 43%
1909 2301 -8%
1910 3277 42%
1911 1811 -45%
1912 1952 8%
1913 1521 -22%
1914 1713 13%
1915 1493 -13%
1916 2001 34%
1917 989 -51%
1918 3138 217%
1919 2140 -32%
1920 2766 29%
1921 1778 -36%
1922 2112 19%
1923 2118 0%
1924 3153 49%
1925 3743 19%
1926 4278 14%
1927 2955 -31%
1928 3669 24%
1929 2327 -37%
1930 2616 12%
1931 1345 -49%
1932 900 -33%
1933 616 -32%
1934 623 1%
1935 727 17%
1936 1244 71%
1937 1685 35%
1938 1674 -1%
1939 2294 37%
1940 3766 64%
1941 4457 18%
1942 6032 35%
1943 3509 -42%
1944 3450 -2%
1945 2211 -36%
1946 3091 40%
1947 6068 96%
1948 5651 -7%
1949 4581 -19%
1950 6134 34%
1951 5239 -15%
1952 5559 6%
1953 5694 2%
1954 7183 26%
1955 7331 2%
1956 4821 -34%
1957 4651 -4%
1958 6144 32%
1959 7806 27%
1960 5624 -28%
1961 6223 11%
1962 8129 31%
1963 6798 -16%
1964 4176 -39%
1965 4969 19%
1966 6738 36%
1967 8929 33%
1968 9619 8%
1969 6368 -34%
1970 3357 -47%
1971 2339 -30%
1972 3743 60%
1973 3530 -6%
1974 3932 11%
1975 4857 24%
1976 6509 34%
1977 9876 52%
1978 9393 -5%
1979 7569 -19%
1980 5774 -24%
1981 5238 -9%
1982 2727 -48%
1983 5231 92%
1984 5780 10%
1985 5148 -11%
1986 5616 9%
1987 7018 25%
1988 6425 -8%
1989 7178 12%
1990 7571 5%
1991 4756 -37%
1992 4929 4%
1993 4531 -8%
1994 5269 16%
1995 4131 -22%
1996 4663 13%
1997 4353 -7%
1998 5453 25%
1999 5419 -1%
2000 4595 -15%
2001 5688 24%
2002 4729 -17%
2003 7468 58%
2004 7516 1%
2005 7684 2%
2006 7347 -4%
2007 6763 -8%
2008 5605 -17%
2009 2950 -47%
2010 2719 -8%
2011 2718 0%
2012 3454 27%
2013 4201 22%
2014 4154 -1%
2015 4310 4%
2016 4893 14%
2017 4922 1%
2018 5245 7%
2019 4691 -11%
2020 4621 -1%
2021 3678 -20%
2022 292 -92%

Commercial buildings were also interesting:

To display on a map, I had to split into "Vashon" and "not Vashon" to get below Google's 2000 limit

year buildings % change
1882 1
1883 1
1884 0
1885 0
1886 0
1887 0
1888 0
1889 0
1890 1
1891 0
1892 0
1893 0
1894 0
1895 1
1896 0
1897 0
1898 0
1899 1
1900 407 40600%
1901 108 -73%
1902 77 -29%
1903 58 -25%
1904 102 76%
1905 91 -11%
1906 180 98%
1907 144 -20%
1908 183 27%
1909 201 10%
1910 346 72%
1911 121 -65%
1912 133 10%
1913 101 -24%
1914 125 24%
1915 94 -25%
1916 131 39%
1917 74 -44%
1918 145 96%
1919 107 -26%
1920 267 150%
1921 107 -60%
1922 153 43%
1923 162 6%
1924 213 31%
1925 259 22%
1926 319 23%
1927 226 -29%
1928 346 53%
1929 189 -45%
1930 241 28%
1931 91 -62%
1932 77 -15%
1933 46 -40%
1934 57 24%
1935 65 14%
1936 117 80%
1937 102 -13%
1938 111 9%
1939 93 -16%
1940 220 137%
1941 160 -27%
1942 135 -16%
1943 93 -31%
1944 58 -38%
1945 170 193%
1946 345 103%
1947 323 -6%
1948 344 7%
1949 278 -19%
1950 413 49%
1951 254 -38%
1952 266 5%
1953 276 4%
1954 346 25%
1955 490 42%
1956 404 -18%
1957 494 22%
1958 471 -5%
1959 557 18%
1960 583 5%
1961 394 -32%
1962 585 48%
1963 535 -9%
1964 460 -14%
1965 563 22%
1966 608 8%
1967 729 20%
1968 761 4%
1969 743 -2%
1970 629 -15%
1971 341 -46%
1972 325 -5%
1973 319 -2%
1974 404 27%
1975 489 21%
1976 402 -18%
1977 629 56%
1978 768 22%
1979 966 26%
1980 872 -10%
1981 510 -42%
1982 408 -20%
1983 462 13%
1984 495 7%
1985 655 32%
1986 682 4%
1987 645 -5%
1988 636 -1%
1989 631 -1%
1990 592 -6%
1991 389 -34%
1992 332 -15%
1993 251 -24%
1994 270 8%
1995 317 17%
1996 343 8%
1997 309 -10%
1998 381 23%
1999 481 26%
2000 553 15%
2001 449 -19%
2002 377 -16%
2003 338 -10%
2004 330 -2%
2005 416 26%
2006 371 -11%
2007 463 25%
2008 440 -5%
2009 294 -33%
2010 216 -27%
2011 148 -31%
2012 191 29%
2013 183 -4%
2014 321 75%
2015 299 -7%
2016 335 12%
2017 341 2%
2018 313 -8%
2019 318 2%
2020 219 -31%
2021 189 -14%
2022 8 -96%



Still nothing downtown. Finally after adding in commercial buildings to 1910, I see some things downtown. There is a separate file for apartments that I may try adding in later. 


Old houses end up being where you would expect them to be. Queen Anne. Capital Hill. Ballard. There are also a smattering of other places.

Maybe apartm