Showing posts with label nathaniel hawthorne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nathaniel hawthorne. Show all posts

Sunday, May 19, 2024

The Scarlet Letter

 The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne

[This was written around 1990. I'm not sure what edition was being used. I picked a random one for the links. I doubt the pages match.]

The world of Puritan New England, like the world of today, was filled with evil influences. Many people were able to withstand these temptations; unfortunately, many others have fallen victim to the evil. Often, a single act of iniquity has devastated a person's life. In The Scarlet Letter, Hester, Chillingworth, and Dimmesdale were each destroyed mentally and physically by one diabolical act that mushroomed to overcome their lives.


Hester's life was the one which most externally displayed the destruction inflicted upon it by wrong-doing. Physically, she "stood on the scaffold of pillory, an infant on her arm, and the letter 'A' in scarlet, fantastically embroidered with gold thread upon her bosom" (The Scarlet Letter 66). Because of the "A", the entire community knew she had sinned, and she became a social outcast. In her attempts to pay penance for her sins, she lived a life of poverty, donating most of her income to charity. However, even the most lowly and wretched of the creatures in Boston, which she helped, "not unfrequently insulted the hand that fed them" (87). Furthermore she left behind her beauty and elaborate dress for a dress of the "coarsest materials and the most sombre hue" (86).

Hester's sin also harmed her mind and soul. The joy she found in knitting, "like all other joys, she rejected it as a sin" (87). Also, she suffered each time she saw Dimmesdale. A mutual love remained between them, but they could not show the love. Even a brief encounter with Dimmesdale, the father of her daughter, would cause "a deeper throb of pain; for, in that brief interval, she had sinned anew" (89). Moreover, at one point, she had begun to lose faith in the fact that her daughter was human. She began to believe the sayings of townspeople who "had given out that poor little Pearl was a demon offspring" (100). Hence her body and mind suffered greatly for her sin of adultery.

Roger Chillingworth's life was also destroyed by his evil. The most noticeable of his changes was the degradation of his physical appearance. When he was first seen in the novel, "there was a remarkable intelligence in his features, as of a person who had so cultivated his mental part that it could not fail to mould the physical to itself and become manifest by unmistakable tokens" (67). Chillingworth then took up residence with Dimmesdale and began his quest to punish the minister. After he began his quest the townspeople observed "something ugly and evil in his face which they had not previously noticed, and which grew still the more obvious to sight, the oftener they looked upon him" (126). Soon his wife, Hester, found "the former aspect of an intellectual and studious man, calm and quiet, which was what she best remembered in him, had altogether vanished and been succeeded by an eager searching, almost fierce, yet carefully guarded look" (163). Furthermore, his life had become controlled by evil to the extent that once Dimmesdale had died, Chillingworth "withered up, shrivelled away, and almost vanished from mortal sight" (242).

Though evil took a great toll upon him physically, it caused much more damage to his mind.

He had begun the investigation, as he imagined, with 
the severe and equal integrity of a judge, desirous 
only of truth, even as if the question involved no 
more than the air-drawn lines and figures of a 
geometrical problem, instead of human passions and 
wrongs inflicted on himself.  But, as he proceeded, a 
terrible fascination, a kind of fierce, though still 
calm, necessity seized the old man within its gripe 
and never set him free again, until he had done all 
its bidding. (127)

When he started, Chillingworth did not notice the change that had come upon him, but, after it was too late to change directions, he realized that his life had become obsessed with evil. He told Hester that "he had grown to exist only by this perpetual poison of the direst revenge" (165). And furthermore, he declared, "I have already told thee what I am! A fiend!" (166). He knew that the devil now had full control of his life, and he could do nothing but further perpetrate the evil that he had started.

Though Dimmesdale committed the sin of adultery with Hester, his punishment was augmented because he failed to immediately confess. As the town's minister, he knew the harm of an unconfessed sin, and charged Hester to:

"speak out the name of thy fellow-sinner and fellow-
sufferer!  Be not silent from any mistaken pity and 
tenderness for him; for, believe me, Hester, though he 
were to step down from a high place, and stand there 
beside thee on thy pedestal of shame, yet better were 
it so, than to hide a guilty heart through life.  What 
can they silence do for him, except to tempt him - 
yea, compel him, as it were - to add hypocrisy to the 
sin?  Heaven hath granted thee an open ignominy, that 
thereby though mayest work out an open triumph over 
the evil within thee, and the sorrow without.  Take 
heed how thou deniest to him - who, perchance, hath 
not the courage to grasp it for himself - the bitter, 
but wholesome, cup that is now presented to they 
lips!" (73)

However, Dimmesdale held his sin within himself, using the justification that some sinners, "guilty as they may be, retaining, nevertheless, a zeal for God's glory and man's welfare, they shrink from displaying themselves black and filthy in the view of men; because, thenceforward, no good can be achieved by them; no evil of the past be redeemed by better service" (130). Unfortunately, he did not trust this reasoning. He had tried many times to confess his sin, but he always fell short.

Dimmesdale's feelings of guilt for his unconfessed sin caused him to seek his own private penance. To help relieve his soul of the agony caused by his sin, Dimmesdale fasted "rigorously, and until his knees trembled beneath him as an act of penance" (141). He also "kept vigils, likewise, night after night" (141), that he might have the evil of his sin relieve from his conscience. This resulted in a great physical suffering, for:

His form grew emaciated; his voice, though still rich 
and sweet, had a certain melancholy prophecy of decay 
in it; he was often observed, on any slight alarm or 
other sudden accident, to put his hand over his heart, 
with first a flush and then a paleness, indicative of 
pain.  (119)

His continual decline of health allowed Chillingworth to obtain residence with him. In these close quarters, Chillingworth became "a chief actor in the poor minister's interior world" (137), and had the ability to make the minister suffer both mental and physical agony.

Evil destroyed the lives of Hester, Chillingworth, and Dimmesdale. Each had the potential for excellence in his own field, whether it be medicine, ministry, or womanhood, yet a single sin turned their lives on a downward path. Each of the primary characters in The Scarlet Letter failed to see the consequences that he would face after tasting the fruits of sin. Likewise, Jim Bakker, Marion Berry, and Gary Hart are examples of people from today's society who committed major sins. Their sins grew to crush their hopes of obtaining great success in life.

Sunday, November 04, 2018

The House of Seven Gables

House of the Seven Gables is written in the flowery prose common in the mid 19th century. The story deals with a house that has been in the home of the Pyncheon family for some time. However, it was originally obtained by not so good means. (Somebody was accused of witchcraft, and then their property was taken.) Alas, since then, the house has been "cursed". One of the current residents opens up a store. There is also a resident that is in poor health - however, he is rumored to know the source of a vast wealth sought after by a relative (a judge.) The Judge dies and it turns out there is an "indian dead" that is now worthless.
It brings about an interesting point about wealth. If somebody has accumulated a vast amount of wealth and nobody else knows about it, what happens? It may be something that the owner could call upon. However, the people currently working with it would probably just continue on their lives with it as is. It probably wouldn't do anybody else any good.
The book itself has stood the test of time. It has served as an influence for other writers and genres (alas, not ones that I have a particular fondness.)

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Great Classic Stories 2


The ones that stuck out as being good in this collection were
Young Goodman Brown: He wanted to be good, but saw that everyone that he respected was in cohorts with the devil. It also made me wonder what happened to the deep religiousity form early New England. Will the other super religious areas change that way also?
How I Edited An Agricultural Paper: A great Mark Twain humor piece that I had not read before.
A Piece of String : A small thing ends up leading to dire consequences (watch out for strings!)
Head and Shoulders: life intervenes, and roles switch, with the academic's showgirl wife eventually attracting his past intellectual idol.
I didn't like Nuns at Luncheon or Cousin William.
The stories:
Young Goodman Brown (Nathaniel Hawthorne, 1835)
The Cask of Amontillado (Edgar Allan Poe, 1846)
Cousin William (Harriet Beecher Stowe, 1855)
How I Edited An Agricultural Paper (Mark Twain, 1870)
A Piece of String (Guy de Maupassant, 1883)
Angela, An Inverted Love Story (W.S. Gilbert, 1890)
Oh! The Public (Anton Chekhov, 1885)
The Nightingale and the Rose (Oscar Wilde, 1888)
The Story of an Hour (Kate Chopin, 1894)
A Coward (Edith Wharton, 1899)
A Jury of Her Peers (Susan Glaspell, 1917)
Araby (James Joyce, 1914)
The Mark on the Wall (Virginia Woolf, 1917)
The Interlopers (Saki, 1919)
Head and Shoulders (F. Scott Fitzgerald, 1920)
The Stranger (Katherine Mansfield, 1921)
The Blind Man (D.H. Lawrence, 1922)
Nuns at Luncheon (Aldous Huxley, 1922)

Great Classic Stories

The problem with listening to short stories is that if you zone out for a bit, you pretty much miss the entire story. Some of the stories were easy to grasp in the time. Others I just glossed right through. I liked The Monkey's Paw, Dr. Heidegger's Experiment, the Tell-Tale Heart and Pat Hobby & Orson Welles. As for the others, I either zoned out for a bit and didn't grasp the story, or paid a attention and didn't like it. Maybe I'll need to go back at a later time. Or perhaps I should just focus on the ones that were the most accessible.

The included stories:
Reginald on House Parties - Saki
The Sphinx without a Secret - Oscar Wilde
Tobermory - Saki
On Being Idle - Jerome K Jerome
The Model Millionaire - Oscar Wilde
The Garden of Truth - E. Nesbit
The Cat that Walked by Himself - Rudyard Kipling
The Girl from Arles - Alphonse Daudet
Mr. & Mrs. Dove - Katherine Mansfield
Georgie Porgie - Rudyard Kipling
Caterpillars - E.F. Benton
Lost Hearts - MR James
Ship to Tarshish - John Buchan
The Tell-Tale Heart - Edgar Allan Poe
The Man of the Night - Edgar Wallace
Dr. Heidegger's Experiment - Nathaniel Hawthorne
B 24 - Arthur Conan Doyle
Pat Hobby & Orson Welles - F. Scott Fitzgerald
Mad - Guy de Maupassant
The Black Cat - Edgar Allan Poe
The Monkey's Paw - WW Jacobs

Friday, April 12, 2013

Classics of American Literature

Classics of American Literature surveys American literature, starting with Benjamin Franklin. He spends multiple lectures covering single works and authors. There were a half-dozen lectures covering Emerson and Thoreau. It didn't leave me with any desire to read them again. However, Benjamin Franklin and Washington Irving seem to be worth going over again. And Nathaniel Hawthorne and Poe rank high on the list.

There tend to be multiple lectures on each author, making the pace rather slow. Twentieth Century literature seems to be be much more in line with works I remember reading. (Thanks to a great high school English teacher. I took mostly Brit. lit in college, so that wasn't much help here.)

He also mentions the "canon" and how some of the "white men" like Eliot, Fitzgerald and Faulkner are out of favor. It is sad that political correctness has gone so overboard that it seeks out minor figures just because they were not represented. This is a great disservice, especially considering one discussion about the inter-relation of the past and present. History is impacted by how the present sees it. While studying lots of obscure writers from the past may make academics feel good, it doesn't help them to understand the people of that time. Then, people read and studied the big guys of the period. Even if there were high quality writers left by the wayside, studying them would not help us understand history any better. Instead, it leaves us just with literature in the isolation. And if we are focusing on isolated literature, we should pick the highest quality literature regardless of authorship or time period. (Though when people 100 years from now study today, they should pick some of the obscure 200 year old works to understand today better.)

I had recently read Invisible Man, so some of the commentary on it seemed to most relevant. Many of the other books discussed seemed to have good points, but not necessarily books that I would like to read. I guess that makes this long series of lectures a time saver.