Showing posts with label daniel Pink. Show all posts
Showing posts with label daniel Pink. Show all posts

Monday, April 04, 2022

The Power of Regret: How Looking Backward Moves Us Forward

"No Regrets" is a mantra of those that feel they lived the best they could. Is that something we should aim for? Daniel Pink says no. Instead, regret should be used as a positive tool to push us forward. Spending too much time dwelling on the "could have/should haves" is not productive. However, learning from our experiences can be helpful.

Humans tend to be most adversely affected when they are "close". In one study, olympic bronze medalists were found to be happier than silver medalists. Those in third were happy to earn a medal, while those in second regret that they could not have pushed themselves further to get gold. Another study compared too options for a raffle rewarding positive behavior. In one, those who did what they were supposed to had a ticket in the raffle. In another, everyone had a ticket in the raffle, but those that failed to complete the task did not get the prize. The second approach was much more motivating. People were more upset that they could have received the prize, but failed to do what was needed.

Regret of commission is also different than regret of commission. 

On tests, people regret switching from incorrect answer to correct answer. However, the regret is not as strong for failure to switch from incorrect to correct answer. (Despite conventional wisdom, it was found that people that switch answers tend to do better.) 

Some people try to maximize experiences. There is a quest to avoid regret. (An example is Jeff Bezos and starting Amazon to avoid regret of not doing it.) This can be a negative in which we spend too much time avoiding possible regret that we have difficulty making decisions. (Booking travel always seems to fall into that realm.)

Regret assumes agency. If we cannot control something we cannot regret the outcome. If something is 100% out of our control, we do not regret it. However, there is almost some point where we do have control. (We may have chosen not to travel somewhere, thus avoiding an earthquake. ) By optimizing regret, we can improve our lives.


Sunday, August 26, 2018

When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing

When posits the thesis that "when" you do something can be as a more important than how you do it (or what you do.) Sometimes, bad timing can result in significantly different outcomes. Somebody that begins their career during a recession is likely to end up significantly behind somebody that started during an economic boom. Similarly, time of day can impact the decision making process. (Perhaps the Lucitania was sunk because the captain was not thinking well during the afternoon.) Different people have different times of peak decision making ability. Finding the time can help to make better decisions. Naps can also be very helpful in increasing productivity. (The author laments the ending of the Spanish siesta.) People like to hear the "bad news" first before hearing the good - yet we tend to preface bad news by telling the good. There are many other areas that can be helped by paying head to "when" things are done.

I was Especially interested in the books on time that he recommended:
168 hours - laura candercamp
A geography of time - Robert V Levine
Daily Rituals. How artists work
Internal Time
The Dance of Life - Edward T Hall

Friday, January 14, 2011

Drive


Internal desire and creativity is motivating. For jobs that require some independent thought it is best to give people the freedom to carry out things they see fit. For these tasks, giving external incentives could backfire. (A case in point is the artistic value of commissioned artwork.) Traditional incentives are, however, still valuable for repetitive tedious tasks.

The book presents a valid point and advocates a new "motivation 3.0" methodology to help increase motivation. However, the book also rambles on for too long, and could easily present the same content in a short essay. There are some good examples (such as Best Buy's schedule-less work environment.) However, even these examples seem to be repeated from different angles. The author also seems to be a little too serious about himself and his topic.

Creative freedom is highly motivating. If the base level of compensation is appropriate, the better position would allow people to thrive and productivity to increase. This does not seem like groundbreaking material. Basic corporate environments have been moving in this direction for some time. About 20% of the book does a good job of presenting the background of motivation theory and the reasons for adopting the creative motivation in our modern society. The remaining 80% is repetitive filler.