Showing posts with label Vladimir Nabokov. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vladimir Nabokov. Show all posts

Saturday, March 01, 2025

The Stories of Vladimir Nabokov

The Stories of Vladimir Nabokov by Vladimir Nabokov

The short stories in this collection were written between the 1920s and 1950s. They range in various lengths and styles. One story is about a duel. They protagonist goes through all the steps to fight a duel. Then at the last minute, the opposing party drops out, giving the protagonist a victory without the consequences of actually fighting.

The collection could use some editing. There are a lot of stories here. Some were translated. Others originally in English. Many are totally forgettable. There is a small section at the end about the stories. Some have interesting tidbits, while others are just dates. I would rather have had a better curated selection of stories.

Tuesday, December 31, 2024

Invitation to a Beheading

Invitation to a Beheading by Vladimir Nabokov

Cincinatis is in prison for a bizarre crime. He is sentenced to death. However, they cannot tell him when he will die. He tries to write about his experiences. There are various hangups and issues, such as the executioner getting sick. Finally the day comes. There are some Kafkaesque moments in here, but I had troubled sticking with it. 

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Speak Memory: An Autobiography Revisited

Speak Memory: An Autobiography Revisited by Vladimir Nabokov

Nabokov's desired view of himself comes through in this autobiography. Instead of a strict narrative, it is a collection of essays, usually focussing on different activities or places in his life. He came from a well-to-do Russian family. He was not fond of the Czar and had some sympathy for the revolution. However, that faded as the Lenin/Stalin dictatorship came to be. He likes to point out that his nostalgia is not for the lost wealth, but for the missed homeland. The essays cover some of his childhood actions and friends as well as hobbies. It ends up being a fairly well done autobiography.

Friday, December 20, 2024

The Enchanter

The Enchanter by Vladimir Nabokov

Nabokov wrote The Enchanter in Russian while living in Paris. It was among his last works written in Russian. The novella is somewhat similar to Lolita, but much more disturbing. A man is attracted to a teen girl. He marries her mother. The mother dies. Now the man has custody of the girl. They have a flirtatious,  relationship. He fantasizes about taking the relationship to the next level and attempts to make a move one night when she is sleeping. She wakes up and starts to scream. He realizes how evil he has and runs away to attempt to destroy himself. 

Tuesday, December 10, 2024

Think, Write, Speak

Think, Write, Speak: Uncollected Essays, Reviews, Interviews, and Letters to the Editor by Vladimir Nabokov

The strength of this collection of miscellaneous writings is the purely chronological arrangement. This provides an "unfiltered" biography of Nabokov. During his lifetime, he published another collection (Strong Opinions). This work is the "leftovers" that he chose not to include in that one. Some of the writings are pretty much junk, but there are some gems in there. I found myself rapidly skimming through much of the early writings. In the middle I became engage, and then the interest started waning towards the end.

The book starts with works by an obscure Russian writer who had fled the Bolshevik revolution. Many of the "works" are reviews of obscure Russian works or obituaries for now unknown Russians. It is very difficult to stay interested in the work. There are hints of strong opinions and stubbornness. He has no love for Freud or the Russian Communists. He likes "good writing", but hasn't really come into style of his own.

In the middle, he has left Europe for America. You can see how pedantic he is in some of the letters to the editor requiring minor corrections. Some gems of essays appear here, such as one on learning the Russian language. Then Lolita becomes popular. He loves his work, but tries to appear surprised at the popularity. Some of his "Crotchety Old Man" views start to come out. He doesn't like hippies. He sees men as stronger than women. He doesn't care much for what others think. He also loves butterflies (and has a few "butterfly" interviews included.

In the end, he seems to just get tired of it all. There are a number of interviews where he says almost nothing. Many of the same questions are asked in multiple interviews. His acerbic manner finally starts to tone down shortly before his death. The questions about what language he thinks in are telling. At first his response is that "nobody thinks in words, it is all images". Eventually, he comes to say that he thinks in images. (Though he still criticizes those who mouth words as they read.) I'd almost be ready to diagnose him with mild Aspergers. He states numerous times that he expects to get back to America, but he never seemed to make it. 


Monday, May 20, 2024

Lolita

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov

Movie by: Stanley Kubrick



The 1962 version of Lolita was a rare case in which the movie actual performed better than the book. In a quest to get MPAA approval the movie had to tone tone down the sexuality (which in all truthfulness hardly even existed in the book), and relied more on the psychological vengence. In the movie, Humbert's obsession seems to center primarily around his possessive, self-destructive love for his 'nymphet' Lolita; whereas in the book she evolves to become his carnal slave.

In the book, we delve a little more deeply in to the individual characters. All the characters eventually die premature deaths. None of the characters are inherently bad. They are all mostly good people, who try to do the right thing. Unfortunately they place themselves in temptenting situations, and eventually fall to one small sin, which eventually leads to the greater sexual sin, which eventually leads to their premature death. Lolita is on the outside a complex love-traingle with changing players. However, underneath lies sinister horror story. Not so much concerned with death as with the psychological, theological conflict. The characters wonder what evil can be seen coming out of their satisfying of carnal desires. Only later do they relize, that the long-lasting and wide-spread consequences of their acts.

Lolita's mother takes in a foreign boarder in hopes. In itself not a bad act. However, her intentions are less than pure. From the start the romantic inclinations can be seen. She neglets her family, her own daughter, who she mistreets and wishes to avoid at all costs, in favor of a romantic fling with H. H. Her marriage to him seems to be not so much out of love and family good, but out of a carnal desire and quest for power to rule over the household. Her failure to provide a balanced heart-fealt relationship, lead to her mistrust of H.H. which as a direct consequence led to her snooping around in the diary and freeking out. However, instead of trying to resolve the problem, she went beserko, and tried to do everything herself (as has been her prime fault throughout the story), and in this fit of rage she runs out, and is overtaken by a car, thus instantaneously brings about her own death. Throughout, her intentions (she thought) were always the most pure. She desired to have the perfect little family, with the distant, yet well-bahaved little girl. She wanted to do everything herself to make sure it came about exactly the way she wanted it. She failed to take in to account the desires of others.

Humbert has had a rough past, having to undergo treatment, and suffering through a broken marriage. He couldn't forget things and people that had affected him in his past and go on. This inability to erase the past lead to his seaking out of nympettes: young girls with certain quasi-demon like lustful qualities. He accepted the house with Mrs. Haze only apon becoming infatuated with her daughter, Lolita. He obtained thrills from every little nymph-like action she undertook. Had he sought help to control his desires, the problems might have ended. However, he continued to amplify his lustful urges, always keeping in mind the purity of his little nymphette. His first major transgression came about when he agreed to marry Mrs. Haze. He had no love for her, and was only doing so to become closer to Lolita. His side of the relationship, perhaps as much as his wife's was filled with secret entrigue and double-entendre. They had no love for each other. They didn't even really care for each other; they were just running a show each hammering out his own personal desires while hoping that the mate wouldn't do anything to interfere.

He had at times secretly wished for the death of his wife (for after all, death had become some of his previous loves), even planning out a murder. Yet, his conscience would not permit him to bring about the death of another human being, no matter how much he so desired. Eventually, when his wife's accidental death accored, he jumped on the opportunity to seak his little nymph, hiding the truth from her and even creating a false story in the hotel. His conscience was already guilty, before he had actually committed any perverse act. Had he not harboured carnal desires for his nymphette he would have not brought himself in the situation of easy temptation. And even there, he had outwardly decided that he would not do anything to remove her purity (however, inside, he his libido was urging him to do so.) Once, she made the first advance, his mental decision fell (after, he could reason, since she is no longer pure, there can be no wrong in the repition.) Now he had gone in to deep. There could still be escape and return to normality, though it would be very difficult. In the short run, it was much easier to carry out the present course of carnal gratification, roaming the country so as not to arrouse suspision. Eventually settling down, he was forced to bribe his 'daughter' for every act he wished performed. With an outward goal of providing her with the best possible life, he spoiled her with material items, and sheltered her from other possible 'rivals' and 'evil' activities. He grew dependent on the pleasures that she could extend him, and had to bribe her to keep doing so. He also grew extremely jealous, an obvious symptom of a lastful (as opposed to loving) relationship. Instead of seaking a return to normality, he tried to escape the problems, and continue on the sinful trail. Unfortunately, he had been too restrictive with her and now had a rival for her passion.

Quilty, like Humbert adored Lolita. He employed various forms of trickery, at first (in the movie) merely to get her to be able to grow and participate in a play. However, he had futher desires, and eventually resulted in trickery to snatch her from Humbert. Instead of desiring her to go through a transformation to a normal life, he sought her for his own purposes of perversion. Thus she quickly fled. Quilty's perverse life-style led to the kidnapping of Lolita, which as a direct consequence leads to his murder at the hands of Humbert.

Humbert's obsessive lust lead to his own inability to function normally without his Lo. He had to have. His actions had numbed his conscience to the punt that he would now be able to carry out a murder. Upon receiving a letter from Lolita (Mrs. Dolores Schiller), he immediatley assumes that Mr. Schiller is the kidnapper, the person who stole her and her passions from him. He readies a gun for the trip and a quick assassination. He still is obsessed with Lolita. Even though she is married and expecting a child, he cannot let go of her. He makes one last plea. He desires that she return with him, that they become a couple. Everyone else is now insignificant to him. He has become so obsessed with her, that he cannot have anyone else, and cannot see anybody else with her. Little tidbits such as marriage seem trivial. His own sins have already mentally destroyed him. He viewed as his only salvation, a return to the past glory days with Lolita. However, the past is the past, and there is no returning. Now his only goal was to kill the man who had robbed him of his past pleasure. Upon beeing informed that it was Quilty, he sought him out, and went to his house to perform the murder. Not content with a mere killing, he also desired to see him suffer and moan under the same suffering that he had undergone. After draining his gun on Quilty, Humbert was able to walk away, his conscience long since seasing to play a major role in his thought process. He has now totally destroyed. His death in prison was nothing more than the body's delayed reaction to the death of the soul.

Lolita was perhaps the most innocent or perhaps the most guilty of the players. She was a rebellious child. Instead of honoring her parents, she did everything against the desires of her mother. She let peer presure overpower her morals and repeated the deflowering act at camp. Her consceince now weekened by sins and a desire for freedom, fell easy prey to Humberts desires. She used her sexuality to secure all kinds of material benefit at Humberts expense. When this relation finally failed to delight her, she was ready to jump ship again, joining the Quilty camp. Unlike Humbert, her conscience still remained intact, and she was able to remove herself from the perversions of the Quilty group, and began anew her life, trying to hide the past. Unfortunately, she had already lost her childhood, and now was trying to start life anew with a real husband. However, she had already learned too much about the world, and still was clinging to tidbits, though she remained the most reformed of the characters. (Doing, perhaps, to her initial naivity.) However, perhaps as fateful, dramatic irony, she died will giving birth to a still-born infant.

Lolita tells the tragedy of four characters who fall victim of their own sins, and live in closed worlds. Both the book and the movie dwell on this metaphysical horror. Can the soon to be released new movie capture this same magic? Misinterpreting the point, Lolita's character is seen today as a pornographic symbol. However, Nabokov's novel was thematically strong, but physically tame. (Noticably absent from the work were profanity and detailed sexual descriptions.) Will the new movie do the same? Will it succeed in portraying the psychological tradgedy, or will it become yet another Hollywood scum movie? Well, I'm not holding my breath. jh 19 June 1996

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Luzhin Defense

The Luzhin Defense is one of Nabakov's earlier novels, originally published in Russian in 1930 and not translated into English until 1964. The title character, Luzhin is an awkward, likely autistic man who is an excellent chess player. As a youth, he does not have friends, but develops a passion for chess after he has been introduced. He reaches grandmaster level and becomes engaged to a girl (much to her parent's chagrin.) However, during a high level tournament, he has a nervous breakdown. Chess appears to be the cause of his problems, and he must ween himself from it to be healthy again. He does, and soon makes a recovery. However, he later encounters people and events from his past, eventually having his mental health fade again.
In the introduction, Nabakov claims he structured the novel like a chess match, complete with surprises and rapid turns. It does have a focus on chess, yet understanding of the game is not required to understand the novel. Nabokov does seem to enjoy picking something external (like a chess game or literary criticism) as a vehicle for structuring novels. In the Luzhin defense he is successful in creating an accessible story out of a chess match.

Saturday, June 30, 2018

Pale Fire

Pale Fire is written as a scholarly annotated poem by a dead poet. The "author" (Charles Kinbote) is a scholar neighbor of the dead poet, Shade. It consists of an introduction by the author, the 999 line poem and the commentary of the poem. The introduction gives you a clue that there is something else going on here. The "author" is very full of himself, and feels overly impressed that he is friends with Shade. The poem itself is a very basic, juvenile work. Nothing that would be really "good" on its own.

The commentary seems to have nothing to do with the poem. The "explicator" uses minor bits of information in the poem to go off an a tangent about something totally different. There are a few main stories. One is about a King that escapes a fictional country. Another is about an assassin that is attempting to kill said King. The third tangent is somewhat more related to the poem and involves the life of Shade and his family and the relationship of Shade to Kinbote. The stories gradually become more intertwined, leading to some possible interrelations. Perhaps Kinbote is actually the King. Perhaps the murderer was trying to kill the King, rather than Shade. Maybe Kinbote is just a crazy stalker who has been much too obsessed with Shade and unable to accomplish significant scholarship on his own.

On one level, the work can be seen as a deep satire of academia. The Kinbote takes himself way too seriously and comes up with detailed interpretations that would be hard to justify based on the merits of the text. (Many long bits of commentary are related only in that Shade had written bits of the poem at the same time another event happened.) Even sections that may be somewhat justified are more highly influenced by the life of the commentator than the actual poet.

On another level, the use of a poem provides an innovative way to tell a "hypertext" story. Different sections can be followed back and forth to unearth the intertwined tales. They are a fiction wrapped in another fiction, making it open to many possible interpretations. I am not sure weather the fictional country is "real" in the universe of the story or if it is in fact made up in the mind of the "author." This opens many possible interpretations of the work.