Showing posts with label 1788. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1788. Show all posts

Sunday, November 16, 2025

The Portable William Blake

The Portable William Blake by William Blake, edited by Alfred Kazin

This is a more complete collection than the audiobook I listened to before. However, it still has gaps. Some of the poems are just "selections" from a greater work.  I've added dates primarily for ones that have complete works and a single date. His works tend to be very "grand" in scope. He has an elaborate mythology created. He used pictures and words, so would probably be right at home as a comic book author today. He has a large scale universe with grand mythological porportions.


There is No Natural Religion (1788) - a logical deduction series that looks at man being limited by senses. God is infinite. Man is Finite.
All Religions are One (1788) - Another logical deduction. This one uses a "poetical genius" as the source of all religions.

Songs of Innocence - these were 
Songs of Experience
Additional Poems

Verses and fragments from the Rossetti and Pickering manuscripts

Selections from the Letters

The Prophetic Books
  • The Marriage of Heaven and Hell (1793) - see previous entry
  • For the Sexes: The Gates of Paradise
  • The Book of Thel (1789) - A sort of love poem. She is a deific woman who is all consuming. The boem ends with comparisons to many body parts.
  • Visions of the Daughters of Albion (1793) - tied a bit of love with mythological grandeur. 
  • America - A Prophecy (1793) - Has a mixture of historical events and figured tied together with elaborate tales from Blake's mythology
  • Europe (1794) - does mention Music of the Spheres. Did Coldplay get ideas here? Other than a few references such as England and Thames, this is more of a mythological world than identifiable Europe
  • The First Book of Urizen (1794) - reminded me of Marvel works. This is a more typical epic poem of super beings 
  • The Book of Ahania (1795) - Urizen is mentioned a lot in this work that extends the universe
  • The Book of Los (1795) - another related Urizen work
  • The Song of Los (1795) - ties together Urizen with biblical and contemporary figures
  • Selections From ”The Four Zoas'' (1797) (or Vala) - This has nine "nights" each of which is a vvery long epic poem in its own right. It includes much of Blake's mythology 
  • Selections From “Milton'' 
  • Selections From “Jerusalem''
From The Laocoön Group
From A Descriptive Catalogue of Pictures, Poetrical and Historical inventions...

From Public Address [From the Rosetti MS.]
On Homer's Poetry and on Virgil (1820) - short prose from Blake discussing old poets
Marginalia, I
Epigrams and Verses Concerning Sir Joshua Reynolds
Marginalia, II
Epigrams, Verses, and Fragments

Fragments - Inscription in the autograph album of William Upcott
The Everlasting Gospel (1818) - a look at Christianity and musings on the details of events from the Bible
A Vision of the Book of Job
From A Vision of the Last Judgemet [From the Rosetti MS]


Wednesday, May 15, 2013

The Federalist Papers

The federalist papers are a series of articles defending the US consitution. It is not a "story" and is a struggle to get through. (It seems to be the type of source that you would use to extract "quotes" to support some viewpoint.) Many of the points are still applicable today. Some of the points are verified in the negative. In defending the president, one key point is that access to repeat elections is unfettered. Oops. Maybe the "lame duck" second term presidents we have is part of our problems today. Also, today's representative constituency has far exceeded the "optimal size".

The dates at the start of each "paper" help drill in the fact that the creation of the USA was a long process. A dozen years after 1776, the American continent is still far from having a unified country. At the time it was still much like an infant European Union. (Perhaps we should send this to the EU as they struggle to create a unified system while still maintaining autonomy.)

In the discussion of judges, the authors attempt to counteract the perceived weakness of the judiciary. Well, the judges have managed to take much of that into there own hands today. (And we are now having the opposite issue.) There are also many other tidbits of the debate. Some are still right-on today, while others are long since dated. These guys obviously spent a lot of time thinking about and supporting their pet cause, the US constitution.