This story opens up more questions than it answers. Who were these people that created the "mortality doctrine"? How did the virtual world know that it was something valuable that could be taken? How could virtual creations so easily "kill" real world creations? You wonder if the author had some ideas for the background but just couldn't quite flush them out.
Showing posts with label James Dashner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Dashner. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 26, 2019
Gunner Skale: An Eye of Minds Story: The Mortality Doctrine
This story opens up more questions than it answers. Who were these people that created the "mortality doctrine"? How did the virtual world know that it was something valuable that could be taken? How could virtual creations so easily "kill" real world creations? You wonder if the author had some ideas for the background but just couldn't quite flush them out.
Thursday, November 14, 2019
The Game of Lives (The Mortality Doctrine, Book Three)
The mortality doctrine provides "immortality" by allowing people to live some of their lives in the real world and some in the virtual world. It would seem to have a bunch of holes in it. What would happen if the real world population spiraled beyond carrying capacity? Or what if the "tangent" population got so great that there not enough bodies to inhabit? Or what if some of the "real" people decided to just pull the plug on the virtual world? And what if people just decide they don't like this immortality thing? Lots of things to explore. But, most of the time is just spent with people fighting and getting saved at the last minute. In the end, the real world is saved from the virtual and makes a quick trip back to normalcy. (Really? Wouldn't there be a call to ban the virtual world after all that had happened?) Could artificial intelligence one day decide it did not want to be subservient and take over our world? Alas, this was a thriller, leaving the metaphysical as a backdrop. The action is nonstop, even as the character development is lacking. (The character of Gabby seems especially undeveloped.)
Labels:
2015,
audiobooks,
books,
Erik Davies,
James Dashner,
mortality doctrine,
science fiction
Friday, November 08, 2019
The Rule of Thoughts (The Mortality Doctrine, Book Two)
"Is this the real life?
Is this just fantasy?"
The opening to Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody pops in my head as I read Rule of Thoughts. The three kids love playing in a virtual reality world. However, a artificially intelligent "tangent" has implemented the "mortality doctrine" to allow virtual beings to inhabit the bodies of real people. The "virtual" has spilled over to the "real".
The kids see parents kidnapped and try to hook up with a "VirtNet Agent" to try to stop the destruction in the real world. However, when they thought they were destroying it in the virtual world, they were actually in the real world.
This feels like a rehash of the Maze Runner series. The kids are part of some elaborate game controlled by adults. They are trying to figure it out and "solve" it in order to save the world. However, they have trouble figuring out what is real and what is not. They almost always feel some sort of "unease" when going down a path that seems right at the time, but ends up being bad in the long run. There are also a few deaths on the way.
There is a tingling of romantic tension in the story, with Michael and Sarah seemingly on the verge of a relationship, but never quite expressing their feelings. (Though that does leave the other boy as a third wheel.) There is also the interesting tension of Gabby, the "real" girlfriend of Michael's adopted body. She traces him down and makes a few appearances. It feels like she should be more important than she is.
Labels:
2014,
audiobooks,
books,
Erik Davies,
James Dashner,
mortality doctrine,
science fiction
Wednesday, November 06, 2019
A Mutiny in Time: Infinity Ring, Book 1
The Eye of Minds: Mortality Doctrine, Book One
Labels:
2013,
audiobooks,
books,
Erik Davies,
James Dashner,
mortality doctrine,
science fiction,
video games
Monday, October 21, 2019
The Fever Code: Maze Runner, Book Five; Prequel
Wicked is portrayed as a stereotypical government agency that exists so that it can exist. It's predecessor had initially launched the virus to help control the human population after sun flares wrecked havoc on the environment. After the virus spun out of control, they were tasked with finding a cure. They would adopt any means to justify the ends, including ripping children from homes and killing their parents. They employed gruesome means of controlling the children in their justification.
This book continues on the theme of "beware unintended consequences". Is it worth it to throw away human civility in the quest for a miracle? It seems easy to justify. If the miracle does materialize, everyone would be saved. If it doesn't, then everyone would be dead. Though the mortgage of morality in quest of the miracle may be the very thing that keeps society from the peace it needs.
Labels:
2016,
audiobooks,
books,
James Dashner,
Mark Deakins,
maze runner,
post-apocalyptic,
science fiction
Sunday, October 20, 2019
The Death Cure (Maze Runner, Book Three)
Wicked had been tasked with finding a cure for what was apparently a biological weapon. People put their hope in this cure, and assumed that any ends would justify the means. People were lax on containing the outbreak because they though a cure was imminent. Alas, even with great effort, they were not able to find the cure. One leader with foresight had also set out a "plan b" that would put a bunch of immune people in a remote area. They would build up their own society and continue the human race after the rest of the world had fallen apart.
This "plan b" seems to be a wishful-thinking cop out. Could an area really be so remote that nobody else would discover it? Would society really disintegrate so fast that everybody would be cannibalized? There is potential for a couple more series exploring the "immune" society and the "collapse" of primary society. Would some of those immune be able to survive in the primary society? Would the isolated immunes turn on themselves? Could a society whose leaders killed in cold blood really continue peaceably? Is this saying something about some of our current problems, like climate change? IS it best just to find those that can deal with it, and let other parts of the world flood away? And we still have many open questions about why there is such a need to control the minds of people, and why they felt it good not to get memories back. And why was so much violence necessary? Many questions are left unanswered at the "end" of the series. IT seems obvious that additional books are needed.
Labels:
2011,
audiobooks,
books,
James Dashner,
Mark Deakins,
maze runner,
science fiction
Saturday, October 05, 2019
Scorch Trials: Maze Runner, Book 2
The book starts out where they left off in the first Maze Runner. However, things get weird. The girl disappears and is replaced by a boy. He had lived in an alternate experiment where he was the only boy among girls. He could also telepathically communicate with a girl. However, that girl was shot at the end. They see new things tattooed on their skin. Their lodging seems to do weird things. One day a man appears and gives them their "quest".
They go on the quest. They discover the alternate "girl group". They also run into some other "normal" people. In one case, Thomas is shot by somebody with an old gun. He finds himself whisked out of the world and operated on. Having people die seems fine, but it must be in the way expected.
In the end, Thomas is betrayed only to find that is the way out. We are told this is the end of the trial and now they will be in the real world. But do we believe it? The book goes overboard playing with "reality" that it is difficult to care. Is this the real world? Or is it fantasy? Does it matter? Is the real world one we would care about? That is the important lesson for a reader. The world is very different, yet it is set in the values of today. Would that realistically happen?
Labels:
2010,
audiobooks,
books,
James Dashner,
Mark Deakins,
maze runner,
post-apocalyptic,
science fiction
Friday, September 20, 2019
Maze Runner
One day a girl appears, bringing on the beginning of the end. They finally make their way out of the maze, only to find it was part of a horrible experiment. The earth has been smitten by a plague. The maze was set up by a company in hopes of breeding special humans that can help come up with a solution. Other humans help rescue them. (This all seems to coincidentally come at the same time.)
The novel is very dark. These kids are locked in a fake world with real monsters with real death. Is this justified if it can bring about a cure for humanity? Ironically, the kids justify much to save a single boy, but find it abhorrent that they may all be sacrificed to save the human race. Does justification simply depend on free choice?
Labels:
2009,
audiobooks,
books,
James Dashner,
Mark Deakins,
maze runner,
post-apocalyptic,
science fiction
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)