The author argues that his discovery that plants produce "air" that animals need to survive is his greater (but overlooked) discovery. (His discovery of oxygen is overshadowed by his willingness to lock on to a debunked "flojisten" theory.)
At the outset, the author argues that Priestley is one of the most important figures in the early American history - pointing out that in letters, he is referenced many more times than others like Ben Franklin. However, he does a poor job of proving that argument.
Instead, he spends more time rambling on about how innovation happens, with a lot of attention paid to Thomas Kuhn's, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions". It does make for some interesting reading. But, alas diverges from the central focus.
No comments:
Post a Comment